| Kaylan ( @ 2006-05-19 13:58:00 |
new pet peeve
dan brown is a writer of fiction, not a historian. there is no 'other side to the story' when the story is fictitious.
fiction, people! stop reading into it like it's a lost artifact found in a cave surrounded by monkeys!
you don't see people hypothesizing about whether star wars is real.
dan brown is a writer of fiction, not a historian. there is no 'other side to the story' when the story is fictitious.
fiction, people! stop reading into it like it's a lost artifact found in a cave surrounded by monkeys!
you don't see people hypothesizing about whether star wars is real.